Arkansas Circus

Looking Back; Turning to Ash

Looking back thirty years, I turn to ash;

not salt like Lot’s wife, just ash. That childhood

was not to be looked back upon, white trash

Bible in hand . . . oh, yeah, you preached it good,

didn’t you? “Turn the other cheek!” But God

never deigned to speak to us, thine, or thee!

At some age, I learned your lie—spare the rod . . .

I swore you off, but you never leave me.

 

Those memories of parental love, lash,

angry word-knives, soul butchery. What could

we treasure from that wrecked ship? The mish-mash:

infrequent daytrips? Fishing? What fish could

be pulled out of Woe’s broad river? What broad

umbrella of grace might catch your rain? Three

his, we two yours—seven seeds for hell’s sod.

I swore off sorrow —it never leaves me . . .

 

to any sort of lasting peace. The crash

and wail, the dance and scream, leather or wood

in the hand of a madwoman, you . . . smash

it down with fiend-fired eyes and rage withstood

by flesh while souls splinter—this is the GOD

you taught your five charges. But we can see

behind lies’ curtain—knew its, and your, fraud

I forgave you then; this never leaves me

 

absolved, though I pray it gone. So, how would

we know? At ten then, now at forty, free

as any sinner in hell. At manhood

I swore you off, but you never leave me.

 

David M Pitchford

19 November 2007 / rev. 18 December 2007/ Rev. 15 May 2008

2 Responses to “Arkansas Circus”

  1. Zahhar Says:

    Came to see this via poetryblogrankings.com. I rated you pretty high there because of the quality of this poem, but because there’s only one poem here I didn’t rate as highly as I might have if there were more such poems posted here.

    You’ve utilized a rhyming structure here in a way that has a very free feel to it, which isn’t easy to accomplish. To do this you’ve sacrificed some metrical consistency, though there is rhythmical consistency.

    The main challenge I see for you with this poem is the reuse of the rhyme throughout the poem, in each of the octets. Very very difficult on a good day.

    The subject matter, I’ll admit, doesn’t do much for me, though analyzing the subject matter in relation to the structure made it more interesting to me. Well, one thing is for certain, you deserve to be ranked higher than “Bartoluciano”. I can’t figure out how he’s even on the top one thousand, let alone the top ten.

    Thanks for dropping in. There are lots more poems on this blog, just not too recently. Most of my poetry goes on my other blog http://fringemonkey.wordpress.com
    Thank you as well for the feedback.

  2. MysticWino Says:

    I’ll be posting more poems here on a more consistent schedule. Thanks again for dropping in. Drop back in sometime and check out the newer work.
    David

Leave a Reply